Fw: [LakelandARC] Re: test equipment for rf analysis

Mike Phillips mostsigbit at yahoo.com
Sun May 22 07:45:16 PDT 2011


I'm in N. lakeland, you?  I'm a working stiff, so I'm usually only available in the evenings after 6 or on weekends.  

Mike
  

--- On Sat, 5/21/11, Phil Dentler <k4bhe at tampabay.rr.com> wrote:

From: Phil Dentler <k4bhe at tampabay.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Fw: [LakelandARC] Re: test equipment for rf analysis
To: LakelandARC at yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, May 21, 2011, 11:53 PM







 



  


    
      
      
      


Mike...just getting home from a show I ran....you 
can bring the stuff out and we can put it on the bench.....Let me know your 
sched. Phil

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: 
  Mike 
  Phillips 
  To: LakelandARC at yahoogroups.com 
  
  Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2011 11:36 
  PM
  Subject: Re: Fw: [LakelandARC] Re: test 
  equipment for rf analysis
  
  
  
  
  
    
    
      Phil

I've got two scanners, but they're both 
        blocked from 512-806MHZ. I didn't pick anything up from 170-174MHZ from 
        the mic, but didn't really expect to since it is marked UHF.

I've 
        got a handheld transceiver, but it is only 144-148MHZ, so I cant test 
        any transmission ranges to the receiver.

Thanks for your help so 
        far, any else I could try?  


Mike

    
        

--- On Sat, 5/21/11, Mike Phillips 
        <mostsigbit at yahoo.com> wrote:

        
From: 
          Mike Phillips <mostsigbit at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Fw: 
          [LakelandARC] Re: test equipment for rf analysis
To: 
          LakelandARC at yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, May 21, 2011, 11:58 
          AM


          
          
            
            
              Phil 
Sorry for the delayed response... I'm 
                not sure what you or Anchor mean conflicting, I thought I posted 
                in the original message these are 'incompatible'.  I want 
                to know _how_ they are incompatible- eg what did Anchor change, 
                and can anything be done (by me) to make 'em work.  I own 
                both and therefore can mod both.  I observe the mic appears 
                to have a jtag interface.   I suspect the single rx/tx 
                channel combo where I can receive, it is simply hitting a 
                harmonic.  

Thanks for the info about the freqs, the 
                receiver is s/n  H30000506.  The mic is either s/n 
                0217376374 or s/n C3003792.

I'll try to play with the mic 
                with my scanner and see what I can see, I don't know why I 
                didn't think of 
                that...
 
Mike
KJ4UKY
     
                

--- On Thu, 5/19/11, Phil Dentler 
                <k4bhe at tampabay.rr.com> wrote:

                
From: Phil 
                  Dentler <k4bhe at tampabay.rr.com>
Subject: Fw: 
                  [LakelandARC] Re: test equipment for rf analysis
To: 
                  LakelandARC at yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, May 19, 2011, 
                  6:19 PM


                    
                  
                  
                   
                  ----- Original Message ----- 
                  From: Phil Dentler 
                  To: LakelandARC at yahoogroups.com 
                  Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 2:08 PM
                  Subject: Re: [LakelandARC] Re: test equipment for 
                  rf analysis
                  
  
                  
                  
                  Mike more info on the Anchor 
                  unit....you list conflicting models and wh numbers....I know a 
                  tech in Anchor Audio and called him......The eairlier series 
                  used Vhf  170MHZ freqs and the later units used 700 MHZ 
                  for a very short time then they switched to 682 to 698 MHZ 
                  freqs. Sense our HAM radios or a scanner can get to these 
                  freqs. you can scan them for the most part. Triple check the 
                  model and also the serial number is the key to nailing down 
                  what you have.....next step is yours....Phil 
K4BHE
                  
                    ----- Original Message ----- 
                    
                    From: Mike 
                    To: LakelandARC at yahoogroups.com 
                    Sent: Wednesday, May 
                    18, 2011 9:59 AM
                    Subject: [LakelandARC] 
                    Re: test equipment for rf analysis
                    
  
                    
                    
Thanks for responding Phil, here's the info I have on 
                    the Anchor equipment;

The receiver is integrated into 
                    a loudspeaker MegaVox Pro model MEGA-6000U1. It is set to 
                    wireless channel 9.
The transmitter is a hand-held 
                    wireless microphone model WH-3000. With the mic set to 
                    channel 4, with the equipment in close physical range (~5-10 
                    feet)I can get the rx link lights to illuminate on the 
                    receiver and it will demodulate audio as expected. It 
                    doesn't lock onto the signal too well and will lose the lock 
                    often depending on mic orientation. 
I cannot find any 
                    meaningful documentation on the mfgrs site, but a call to 
                    their support revealed these are not intended to be 
                    compatible. I don't know if the incompatibility is with the 
                    channel 'codes', modulation technique, or carrier. 

I 
                    don't have physical access to the drive-in equipment, but 
                    swear to myself every time I visit the drive-in that I will 
                    bring up the topic here, and finally I'm getting around to 
                    it. If your equipment is at all portable, I'd just like to 
                    give the signal a look-see to see if anything jumps out as 
                    being mis-aligned. I've simply never had a good experience 
                    trying to tune their signal from various locations on the 
                    property using a variety of FM receivers. I figure if I have 
                    problems, everyone else probably does too. 

Mike 
                    Phillips
KJ4UKY 

--- In LakelandARC at yahoogroups.com, "Phil Dentler" 
                    <k4bhe at ...> wrote:
>
> Mike...good 
                    morning.....I can help you with both.....I need to know the 
                    channel code on both pieces.....this will tell us everything 
                    we need to know about the pieces then we will know the next 
                    move....I have a optoelectronics near field receiver that is 
                    used on my bench. The lakeland drive in transmitter that you 
                    want to see is probably a Ramsy product. I install these and 
                    set them up also. What is the model number and I can tell 
                    you your next move on that also. Phil K4BHE
> ----- 
                    Original Message ----- 
> From: Mike 
> To: LakelandARC at yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: 
                    Wednesday, May 18, 2011 12:48 AM
> Subject: 
                    [LakelandARC] test equipment for rf analysis
> 
                    
> 
> 
> Greetings
> 
> I've 
                    got a 16 channel UHF mic from Anchor anchoraudio.com - and a 
                    16 channel uhf receiver from the same company that are 
                    incompatible according to the mfg. I suspect the carrier 
                    freq is shifted and that's why they're 'incompatible'. There 
                    is a single channel where they kinda work, but not too good. 
                    
> I'd like to look at the signals and try to figure 
                    out what's going on. All I've got is a 60mhz DSO. I'm 
                    looking for a spectrum analyzer or whatever you've got and 
                    some RF know-how. Anybody wanna try to help figure this out? 
                    
> A separate project; I'd really also like to look at 
                    the FM signal for the lakeland drive-in. I suspect simple 
                    over modulation, but would really like to look at the 
                    signal. 
> 
> Mike Phillips
> 
                    KJ4UKY
>


                  


    
     

    
    


 



  



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lakelandarc.org/pipermail/cq-lakelandarc.org/attachments/20110522/557f795e/attachment.html>


More information about the CQ mailing list