[LARC-CQ] FCC NPRM

[Matthew Stevens]

> I think the people for whom it will cause the biggest problem are the ones who are constantly changing their callsign.

And that’s not a bad thing imo!

- Matthew nj4y

Sent from my iPhone

> On Aug 30, 2020, at 10:47, Jimmy Russ via CQ <cq at lists.lakelandarc.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> I've read where the ARRL is already on top of this.  Doesn't mean it won't happen but I know they're not going to take it lying down.
> 
> Considering that it averages to $5/year for the license term, I'd do it.  I easily get that much out of ham radio.  I pay a whole lot more than that for other things.  But I get that a whole lot of people are going to be in an uproar since licenses have been free for a long time, and let's face it...hams are notoriously cheap.  I think the people for whom it will cause the biggest problem are the ones who are constantly changing their callsign.
> 
> 
> Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
> 
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>> On Saturday, August 29, 2020 6:24 PM, Ed Marchese via CQ <cq at lists.lakelandarc.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Ran across this today. You may send your comments to the FCC once the NPRM is published and active.  (see article for info)
>> http://k0lwc.com/the-fcc-wants-cold-hard-cash-from-ham-radio-operators/ 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ mailing list
> CQ at lists.lakelandarc.org
> http://lists.lakelandarc.org/listinfo.cgi/cq-lakelandarc.org
> Unsubscribe: <mailto:cq-lakelandarc.org-unsubscribe at lists.lakelandarc.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lakelandarc.org/pipermail/cq-lakelandarc.org/attachments/20200830/99855075/attachment.html>